4.7 Article

Lipids and NADPH-dependent superoxide production in plasma membrane vesicles from roots of wheat grown under copper deficiency or excess

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
卷 52, 期 354, 页码 77-84

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jexbot/52.354.77

关键词

copper; lipids; plasma membrane; superoxide; Triticum durum

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of in vivo copper on the lipid composition of root plasma membrane and the activities of membrane-bound enzymes, such as NADPH-dependent oxidases and lipoxygenase, were studied. Plants were grown in hydroponic culture for 11 d without Cu supply or in the presence of 50 muM Cu. Control plants were supplied with 0.3 muM Cu. Growth of roots was severely affected in the 50 muM Cu-grown plants, whereas roots grown in Cu-deficient solution did not show any difference in comparison with the control. The 50 muM Cu concentration caused an increase in the leakage of K+ ions as well, Excess metal supply resulted in a decrease in the total lipid content of plasma membrane, a higher phospholipid amount and a reduction of steryl lipids (free sterols, steryl glycosides and acylated steryl glycosides), Cu depletion in the growth solution had only a slight effect on the plasma membrane lipid composition, In comparison with the control, only the excess of Cu caused a decrease in the lipid to protein ratio as well as a change in the phospholipid composition, with a lower phosphatidylcholine to phosphatidylethanolamine ratio. The degree of unsaturation of root plasma membranes decreased following the 0 Cu treatment and even more after the 50 muM Cu supply, Plasma membranes of wheat grown under metal deficiency and excess showed increased NADPH-dependent superoxide-producing oxidase activities, whereas membrane-bound lipoxygenase was not increased or activated due to Cu treatments, The consequences of changes in plasma membrane lipid composition and activated oxygen production as a result of Cu treatments are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据