4.4 Article

Coccolithophore ecology at the HOT station ALOHA, Hawaii

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0967-0645(00)00165-X

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cell densities of total coccolithophores and dominant taxa were determined in 183 samples from the upper 200 m of the water column at about monthly intervals between January 1994 and August 1996 at the HOT station ALOHA, Hawaii. High cell densities were observed twice a year, in March (up to 41 x 10(3) cells 1(-1)) and in September/October (up to 52 x 10(3) cells 1(-1)). In the intervening months, cell densities were extremely low (0-20 x 10(3) cells 1(-1)), reflecting a strong seasonality. The main production of coccolithophores took place in the middle photic zone between 50 and 100 m water depth. In total 125 coccolithophore species were identified but only five constituted on average more than 30% of the community: Emiliania huxleyi, Umbellosphaera irregularis, U. tenuis, Florisphaera profunda and Gephyrocapsa ericsonii. The generally low, but seasonally dynamic coccolithophore cell density variability is compared with in situ measurements of environmental parameters. Correlation analyses between cell density variability of the dominant taxa and potentially controlling environmental parameters show significant correlation coefficients when the data set was separated into upper and lower photic zone. Cell densities of all dominant taxa are most highly correlated with temperature variability. U. irregularis is positively correlated in the upper photic zone, whereas E. huxleyi and G. ericsonii are negatively correlated. In the lower photic zone, F. profunda cell densities are positively correlated with light, which corresponds to the maximum bottom-up control (i.e. by physical forcing) of any species encountered. The surprisingly low correlations of cell densities with nitrate and phosphate may be caused by insufficient sampling resolution, nutrient levels close to detection limits, or both. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据