3.8 Review

Evaluation of the characteristics of safety withdrawal of prescription drugs from worldwide pharmaceutical markets-1960 to 1999

期刊

DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL
卷 35, 期 1, 页码 293-317

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/009286150103500134

关键词

market withdrawal; market discontinuation; adverse drug reactions; postmarketing surveillance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A descriptive analysis was conducted to evaluate prescription drugs withdrawn from worldwide pharmaceutical markets over the past four decades due to safety reasons. The list of drugs, including indication, the duration of marketing, and reasons for withdrawal were examined Among the 121 products identified, 42.1% were withdrawn from European markets alone, 5.0% from North America, 3.3% from Asia Pacific, and 49.6% from markets in multiple continents. Distributions of these withdrawals in each decade were: 12.4% from the 1960s, 16.5% from the 1970s, 39.7% from the 1980s, and 31.4% from the 1990s. Unfortunately, since the denominators (number of drug approvals) were not readily available, an accurate rate of withdrawal could not be reliably calculated The most common categories of drugs withdrawn were: Non-Steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (13.2%), nonnarcotic analgesics (8.3%), antidepressants (7.4%), and vasodilators (5.8%). The top five safety reasons for withdrawals were: hepatic (26.2%), hematologic (10.5%), cardiovascular (8.7%), dermatologic (6.3%), and carcinogenic (6.3%) issues. Among the 87 products for which the timing of marketing was available, the median time on the market was 5.4 years,with about one-third withdrawn within the first two years. It is hoped that the current review will stimulate other future research into this important topic. However due to the intrinsic limitations of the descriptive analysis design, our observations are subject to the availability of data in the public domain. Readers are cautioned to be objective and careful when approaching data of this nature in order nor to misinterpret the results due to potential data gaps.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据