3.9 Article

Expression profiles of SF-1, DAX1, and CYP17 in the human fetal adrenal gland: Potential interactions in gene regulation

期刊

MOLECULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 57-68

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/me.15.1.57

关键词

-

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R29DK043140, R01DK054480, R01DK043140] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. Medical Research Council [G9826762, G9900837] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK54480, DK43140] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cytochrome P450 17 alpha -hydroxylase/17-20 lyase (P450(C17)) is a critical branchpoint enzyme for steroid hormone biosynthesis. During human gestation, P450(C17) is required for the production of dehydroepiandrostenedione sulfate by the fetal adrenal cortex and for testicular production of androgens that mediate male sexual differentiation. In this study, we investigate the regulation of the human CYP17 gene by two orphan nuclear receptors, steroidogenic factor 1 (SF-1) and DAX1. In human embryos, SF-1 and DAX1 are expressed throughout the developing adrenal cortex from its inception at 33 days post conception (dpc). In contrast, P450(C17) expression, which commences between 41 and 44 dpc, is limited to the fetal zone. The 5'-flanking region of the human CYP17 gene contains three functional SF-1 elements that collectively mediate a greater than or equal to 25-fold induction of promoter activity by SF-1. In constructs containing all three functional SF-1 elements, DAX1 inhibited this activation by greater than or equal to 55%. In the presence of only one or two SF-1 elements, DAX1 inhibition was lost even though SF-1 transactivation persisted. These data suggest that efficient repression of SF-1-mediated activation of the human CYP17 gene by DAX1 requires multiple SF-1 elements. Opposing effects of SF-1 and DAX1 may fine tune the differential responses of various SF-1 target genes in different endocrine tissues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据