4.3 Article

Utility of the Kurashiki Prehospital Stroke Scale for Hyperacute Stroke

期刊

CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES
卷 31, 期 1, 页码 51-56

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000320854

关键词

Emergency medical service; Prehospital stroke care; Prehospital stroke scale; Tissue plasminogen activator; Acute stroke

资金

  1. Kawasaki Medical School, Japan [k0104274]
  2. Kurashiki Fire Bureau

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Backgrounds: Our aim was to confirm the utility of paramedics using the Kurashiki Prehospital Stroke Scale (KPSS), with a maximum score of 13, for patients who may be eligible for administration of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV t-PA). Methods: The subjects comprised acute stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients transferred to our hospital by paramedics. We analyzed correlations between KPSS and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Patients admitted within 3 h of onset were categorized into 2 groups: KPSS >= 4 and KPSS <4. We compared the proportion of patients receiving IV t-PA between the groups. Results: Among 430 consecutive patients (mean age = 73 years; 266 men), paramedics recorded KPSS for 256 patients (59.5%). Excellent correlation was observed between KPSS and NIHSS in all 256 patients (R = 0.766; p <0.001) and in 94 patients (ischemic stroke and TIA with symptoms on admission) admitted within 3 h of onset (R = 0.706; p <0.001). Among these 94 patients, IV t-PA was more frequently given in the KPSS >= 4 group (30 of 58 patients, 51.7%) than in the KPSS <4 group (5 of 36 patients, 13.9%; p <0.001). Arterial occlusion was more frequently observed in the KPSS >= 4 group (57.9 vs. 31.4%, p = 0.018). KPSS >= 4 was independently associated with administration of IV t-PA (odds ratio = 4.7; 95% confidence interval = 1.5-14.6, p = 0.008). Conclusion: Reliable concordance between KPSS and NIHSS was found in acute stroke and TIA patients. KPSS >= 4 represents a good score to indicate prospective t-PA patients among those admitted within 3 h of stroke onset. Copyright (C) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据