4.4 Article

Syndactyly/brachyphalangy and nail dysplasias as marker lesions for sclerosteosis

期刊

DERMATOLOGY
卷 202, 期 3, 页码 259-260

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000051649

关键词

sclerosteosis; van Buchem disease; syndactyly; brachyphalangy; nail dysplasia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sclerosteosis describes an autosomal recessive form of hyperostosis corticallis generalisata (MIM 239100). Sclerosteosis is primarily a disorder of osteoblast hyperactivity and metabolic abnormalities are not present. Besides generalized bone changes the presence of asymmetric cutaneous syndactyly of the index and middle fingers is characteristic. In many cases this syndactyly is associated with nail dysplasia and therefore dermatologists should recognize this clinical finding as a possible marker of this entity. We report on a 36-year-old female of Greek origin who had had finger and nail dysplasias and facial asymmetry since birth. The patient was hospitalized on the Neurology ward because of increasing spastic and ataxic gait disturbances. Physical examination revealed numerous neurological problems resulting from bony compression of nerves. Furthermore the patient had remarkably deformed fingers with hypoplasia of the second finger on both sides. The nails were dysplastic, especially on both index fingers. All laboratory results concerning metabolic diseases were normal. It has been shown that sclerosteosis is clinically and radiographically very similar to van Buchem disease. Through a genome-wide search with a highly polymorphic microsatellite the gene responsible for van Buchem disease has been mapped to 17q12-q21, and Balemans et al. (1999) assigned the locus for sclerosteosis to the same region providing genetic support for the hypothesis of allelism. Dermatologists should be able to interpret such syndactyly associated with nail deformities as a possible hint for the diagnosis of sclerosteosis in patients with hyperostotic features. Copyright (C) 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据