4.7 Review

Structure-function relationships of beta-D-glucan endo- and exohydrolases from higher plants

期刊

PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 47, 期 1-2, 页码 73-91

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1023/A:1010619128894

关键词

catalytic mechanism; cell wall hydrolysis; monocotyledons; protein modelling; substrate binding; subsite mapping

向作者/读者索取更多资源

(1 -->3),(1 -->4)-beta -D-Glucans represent an important component of cell walls in the Poaceae family of higher plants. A number of glycoside endo- and exohydrolases is required for the depolymerization of (1 -->3),(1 -->4)-beta -D-glucans in germinated grain or for the partial hydrolysis of the polysaccharide in elongating vegetative tissues. The enzymes include (1 -->3),(1 -->4)-beta -D-glucan endohydrolases (EC 3.2.1.73), which are classified as family 17 glycoside hydrolases, (1 -->4)-beta -D-glucan glucohydrolases (family 1) and beta -D-glucan exohydrolases (family 3). Kinetic analyses of hydrolytic reactions enable the definition of action patterns, the thermodynamics of substrate binding, and the construction of subsite maps. Mechanism-based inhibitors and substrate analogues have been used to study the spatial orientation of the substrate in the active sites of the enzymes, at the atomic level. The inhibitors and substrate analogues also allow us to define the catalytic mechanisms of the enzymes and to identify catalytic amino acid residues. Three-dimensional structures of (1 -->3),(1 -->4)-beta -D-glucan endohydrolases, (1 -->4)-beta -D-glucan glucohydrolases and beta -D-glucan exohydrolases are available or can be reliably modelled from the crystal structures of related enzymes. Substrate analogues have been diffused into crystals for solving of the three-dimensional structures of enzyme-substrate complexes. This information provides valuable insights into potential biological roles of the enzymes in the degradation of the barley (1 -->3),(1 -->4)-beta -D-glucans during endosperm mobilization and in cell elongation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据