4.3 Article

TIMP-2 Gene Polymorphism Is Associated with Intracerebral Hemorrhage

期刊

CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES
卷 28, 期 6, 页码 558-563

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000247599

关键词

Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases; Matrix metalloproteinases; SNP; Stroke; Intracerebral hemorrhage; Genetic

资金

  1. National Genome Research Network, Germany [01GS0117]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Both ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage are associated with altered expression and activation of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Particularly relevant are MMP-2 and MMP-9. This proteolytic effect is dampened by tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs). TIMP-2 is an important endogenous inhibitor of MMP-2. Alterations in the TIMP- 2 gene expression may contribute to the incidence of ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage. Methods: TIMP-2 gene SNP -261G/A was genotyped from sequentially recruited stroke patients (n = 356, f/m 151/205, mean age 68.2 years, range 19-100 years) and gender and age matched controls (n = 253, f/m 114/139, mean age 68.5 years, range 32-92 years). The SNP -261G/A was detected after gene sequencing of 95 patients and controls. Furthermore, in a subgroup of 93 patients the serum levels of TIMP-2 were measured during the first 7 days after stroke onset and compared to the genotype. Results: SNP -261G/A in the TIMP-2 gene shows an allele frequency of approximately 39.14%. Homozygosity for allele A is associated significantly with the development of ICH (p = 0.025, OR = 2.020, CI = 1.115-3.661) as compared to heterozygosity and homozygosity for allele G (recessive genotypic model). Concordantly, the serum levels of TIMP-2 showed a nonsignificant decreases, depending on the genotype (p = 0.111). Conclusion: We investigated a SNP 261 base pairs upstream of the start codon in exon 1 of TIMP2. Our data suggest that carriers of homozygosity for allele A are at increased risk of developing intracerebral hemorrhage. Copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据