4.6 Article

Neural Mechanisms of Body Awareness in Infants

期刊

CEREBRAL CORTEX
卷 25, 期 10, 页码 3779-3787

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhu261

关键词

body awareness; cognitive development; infant development; multisensory integration; near-infrared spectroscopy

资金

  1. EC Marie Curie Initial Training Networks [MC-ITN-264301 TRACKDEV]
  2. Wellcome Trust [073985/Z/03/Z]
  3. University of Padua
  4. European Research Council under FP7 [ERC-2013-StG-336050]
  5. UK Medical Research Council [G0701484]
  6. Medical Research Council [MR/K021389/1, G0701484] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. MRC [MR/K021389/1, G0701484] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ability to differentiate one's body from others is a fundamental aspect of social perception and has been shown to involve the integration of sense modalities attributable to the self. Though behavioral studies in infancy have investigated infants' discrimination of body-related multisensory stimuli, whether they attribute this information as belonging to the self is still unknown. In human adults, neuroimaging studies have demonstrated the recruitment of a specific set of brain regions in response to body-related multisensory integration. To test whether the infant brain integrates this information similarly to adults, in a first functional near-infrared spectroscopy study we investigated the role of visual-proprioceptive feedback when temporal cues are manipulated by showing 5-month-old infants an online video of their own face while the infant was performing movements. To explore the role of body-related contingency further, in a second study we investigated whether cortical activation in response to self-initiated movements and external tactile stimulation was similar to that found in the first study. Our results indicate that infants' specialized cortical activation in response to body-related contingencies is similar to brain activation seen in response to body awareness in adults.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据