4.6 Article

Kalirin-9 and Kalirin-12 Play Essential Roles in Dendritic Outgrowth and Branching

期刊

CEREBRAL CORTEX
卷 25, 期 10, 页码 3487-3501

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhu182

关键词

Kalirin knockout mouse; kinase; neurite; Rho GEF

资金

  1. National Institute of Drug Abuse in the National Institutes of Health [DA015464, DA023082]
  2. National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases in the National Institutes of Health [DK032948]
  3. Janice and Rodney Reynolds Endowment
  4. Scoville Endowment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proteins derived from the Kalrn gene, encoding 2 Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) domains, affect dendritic and axonal morphogenesis. The roles of endogenous Kalirin-9 (Kal9) and Kalirin-12 (Kal12), the Kalrn isoforms expressed before synaptogenesis, have not been studied in neurite growth and maturation during early development. The Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster orthologues of Kalrn encode proteins equivalent to Kal9 but, lacking a kinase domain, neither organism expresses a protein equivalent to Kal12. Both in vivo and in vitro analyses of cortical neurons from total Kalrn knockout mice, lacking all major Kalirin isoforms, revealed a simplified dendritic arbor and reduced neurite length. Using isoform-specific shRNAs to reduce Kal9 or Kal12 expression in hippocampal cultures resulted in stunted dendritic outgrowth and branching in vitro, without affecting axonal polarity. Exposing hippocampal cultures to inhibitors of the first GEF domain of Kalirin (ITX3, Z62954982) blunted neurite outgrowth and branching, confirming its essential role, without altering the morphology of neurons not expressing Kalrn. In addition, exogenous expression of the active kinase domain unique to Kal12 increased neurite number and length, whereas that of the inactive kinase domain decreased neurite growth. Our results demonstrate that both endogenous Kal9 and endogenous Kal12 contribute to dendritic maturation in early development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据