4.6 Article

Cognitive Reappraisal of Emotion: A Meta-Analysis of Human Neuroimaging Studies

期刊

CEREBRAL CORTEX
卷 24, 期 11, 页码 2981-2990

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bht154

关键词

affect; fMRI; meta-analysis; reappraisal

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [MH094056, R01 MH076137, R01 HD069178, R01 DA022541, R01 MH076136, RC1 DA028608, R01 DA027794]
  2. National Science Foundation [0631637]
  3. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
  4. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci [0631637] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, an explosion of neuroimaging studies has examined cognitive reappraisal, an emotion regulation strategy that involves changing the way one thinks about a stimulus in order to change its affective impact. Existing models broadly agree that reappraisal recruits frontal and parietal control regions to modulate emotional responding in the amygdala, but they offer competing visions of how this is accomplished. One view holds that control regions engage ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), an area associated with fear extinction, that in turn modulates amygdala responses. An alternative view is that control regions modulate semantic representations in lateral temporal cortex that indirectly influence emotion-related responses in the amygdala. Furthermore, while previous work has emphasized the amygdala, whether reappraisal influences other regions implicated in emotional responding remains unknown. To resolve these questions, we performed a meta-analysis of 48 neuroimaging studies of reappraisal, most involving downregulation of negative affect. Reappraisal consistently 1) activated cognitive control regions and lateral temporal cortex, but not vmPFC, and 2) modulated the bilateral amygdala, but no other brain regions. This suggests that reappraisal involves the use of cognitive control to modulate semantic representations of an emotional stimulus, and these altered representations in turn attenuate activity in the amygdala.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据