4.5 Article

Pendred syndrome, DFNB4, and PDS/SCL26A4 identification of eight novel mutations and possible genotype-phenotype correlations

期刊

HUMAN MUTATION
卷 17, 期 5, 页码 403-411

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/humu.1116

关键词

ARNSHL; Pendred syndrome; PDS; deafness; nonsensory autosomal recessive; DFNB4; genotype-phenotype; goiter

资金

  1. NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE [R01HG000457] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DEAFNESS AND OTHER COMMUNICATION DISORDERS [R01DC002842] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NHGRI NIH HHS [HG00457] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIDCD NIH HHS [R01-DC02842] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mutations in PDS (SLC26A4) cause both Pendred syndrome and DFNB4, two autosomal recessive disorders that share hearing loss as a common feature. The hearing loss is associated with temporal bone abnormalities, ranging from isolated enlargement of the vestibular aqueduct (dilated vestibular aqueduct, DVA) to Mondini dysplasia, a complex malformation in which the normal cochlear spiral of 2 1/2 turns is replaced by a hypoplastic coil of 1 1/2 turns. In Pendred syndrome, thyromegaly also develops, although affected persons usually remain euthyroid. We identified PBS mutations in the proband of 14 of 47 simplex families (30%) and nine of 11 multiplex families (82%) (P=0.0023). In all cases, mutations segregated with the disease state in multiplex families. Included in the 15 different PDS allele variants we found were eight novel mutations. The two most common mutations, T416P and IVS8+1G>A, were present in 22% and 30% of families, respectively. The finding of PDS mutations in five of six multiplex families with DVA (83%) and four of five multiplex families with Mondini dysplasia (80%) implies that mutations in this gene are the major genetic cause of these temporal anomalies. Comparative analysis of phenotypic and genotypic data supports the hypothesis that the type of temporal bone anomaly may depend on the specific PDS allele variant present. Hum Mutat 17:403-411, 2001. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据