4.4 Article

The effectiveness of two intensities of psychosocial treatment for cocaine dependence

期刊

DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE
卷 61, 期 2, 页码 145-154

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0376-8716(00)00136-8

关键词

cocaine dependence; treatment intensity; psychosocial treatment; outpatient; day hospital; services

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Structured treatments for cocaine dependence have been shown to be effective despite high attrition rates. What is unclear is what level of treatment intensity is needed to improve and sustain patient outcomes, especially among low SES urban residents. This study evaluated whether there were differences between two levels of treatment intensities for cocaine dependence in reducing substance use and improving health and social indicators. Ninety-four cocaine dependent predominantly African-American male veterans were randomly assigned to either a 12 h/week day hospital program (DH12) or a 6 h/week outpatient program (OP6) and were evaluated at baseline, during treatment and at 4 and 7 months post-treatment. Both treatments stressed abstinence, behavior change and prosocial adjustment and only differed in level of treatment intensity. During treatment measures included urine toxicologies, program attendance, treatment completion and aftercare attendance. Participants reported a 52% reduction in days of cocaine use and experienced significant improvements in employment and psychiatric functioning at seven months post-treatment. However, there was no significant difference between the DH12 and OP6 programs in terms of abstinence during treatment, treatment completion, treatment or aftercare attendance or any Addiction Severity Index (ASI)-related variable assessing level of functioning at 4 and 7 months. While future research with a larger community-based sample that includes female clients is necessary, the current findings demonstrate that a 6 h/week program is just as effective and thus has a significant cost savings compared to a 12 h/week treatment modality for cocaine dependence. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据