4.3 Article

Characterization of two alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh) loci from the olive fruit fly, Bactrocera (Dacus) oleae and implications for Adh duplication in dipteran insects

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR EVOLUTION
卷 52, 期 1, 页码 29-39

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s002390010131

关键词

alcohol dehydrogenase gene; gene duplication; Tephritidae

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the cloning and structural characterization of two Adh loci of the olive fruit fly, Bactrocera oleae, Each of the two genes, named Adh1 and Adh2, consists of three exons and two introns for a total length of 1981 and 988 nucleotides, respectively. Their deduced amino acid sequences of 257 and 258 residues exhibit a 77% identity and display the characteristics of the insect ADH enzymes, which belong to the short-chain dehydrogenases/reductases family. The Adh genes of B. oleae are compared to the two genes of the Mediterranean fly, Ceratitis capitata, the only other species of the Tephritidae family in which the Adh genes have been studied. On the basis of amino acid divergence the four genes form two clusters each containing one gene from each species, as expected if there was one duplication event before speciation. On the basis of nucleotide sequence the four sequences form two clusters each containing the two sequences from the same species, as expected if there was a separate duplication event in each species, To help decide between the two alternatives, we compared at both the amino acid and DNA level the Adh genes of five Drosophila species that are known to carry two such genes and observed that, with only one exception at the amino acid level, conspecific loci cluster together. We conclude that the information we have at present does not allow a firm choice between the hypothesis of a single duplication event that occurred before the split of Bactrocera and Ceratitis from their common ancestor and the hypothesis of two independent duplication events, one in each of the two genera.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据