4.6 Article

Basic Linguistic Composition Recruits the Left Anterior Temporal Lobe and Left Angular Gyrus During Both Listening and Reading

期刊

CEREBRAL CORTEX
卷 23, 期 8, 页码 1859-1873

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs170

关键词

auditory; visual; basic combinatorics; language; magnetoencephalography; minimal phrases

资金

  1. New York University Whitehead Fellowship for Junior Faculty in Biomedical and Biological Sciences
  2. Neuroscience of Language Lab at NYU Abu Dhabi award from the NYU Abu Dhabi Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Language is experienced primarily through one of two mediumsuspoken words and written text. Although substantially different in form, these two linguistic vehicles possess similar powers of expression. Consequently, one goal for the cognitive neuroscience of language is to determine where, if anywhere, along the neural path from sensory stimulation to ultimate comprehension these two processing streams converge. In the present study, we investigate the relationship between basic combinatorial operations in both reading and listening. Using magnetoencephalography, we measured neural activity elicited by the comprehension of simple adjectivenoun phrases (red boat) using the same linguistic materials and tasks in both modalities. The present paradigm deviates from previous cross-modality studies by investigating only basic combinatorial mechanismsuspecifically, those evoked by the construction of simple adjectivenoun phrases. Our results indicate that both modalities rely upon shared neural mechanisms localized to the left anterior temporal lobe (lATL) and left angular gyrus (lAG) during such processing. Furthermore, we found that combinatorial mechanisms subserved by these regions are deployed in the same temporal order within each modality, with lATL activity preceding lAG activity. Modality-specific combinatorial effects were identified during initial perceptual processing, suggesting top-down modulation of low-level mechanisms even during basic composition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据