4.6 Article

Methylphenidate Enhances Executive Function and Optimizes Prefrontal Function in Both Health and Cocaine Addiction

期刊

CEREBRAL CORTEX
卷 24, 期 3, 页码 643-653

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs345

关键词

anterior cingulate cortex; cerebellum; cocaine addiction; dopamine; dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; executive function; fMRI; methylphenidate; norepinephrine; Stroop

资金

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse [1R01DA023579, 1F32DA030017-01]
  2. US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-98CHI-886]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous studies have suggested dopamine to be involved in error monitoring/processing, possibly through impact on reinforcement learning. The current study tested whether methylphenidate (MPH), an indirect dopamine agonist, modulates brain and behavioral responses to error, and whether such modulation is more pronounced in cocaine-addicted individuals, in whom dopamine neurotransmission is disrupted. After receiving oral MPH (20 mg) or placebo (counterbalanced), 15 healthy human volunteers and 16 cocaine-addicted individuals completed a task of executive function (the Stroop color word) during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). During MPH, despite not showing differences on percent accuracy and reaction time, all subjects committed fewer total errors and slowed down more after committing errors, suggestive of more careful responding. In parallel, during MPH all subjects showed reduced dorsal anterior cingulate cortex response to the fMRI contrast errorcorrect. In the cocaine subjects only, MPH also reduced errorcorrect activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (controls instead showed lower errorcorrect response in this region during placebo). Taken together, MPH modulated dopaminergically innervated prefrontal cortical areas involved in error-related processing, and such modulation was accentuated in the cocaine subjects. These results are consistent with a dopaminergic contribution to error-related processing during a cognitive control task.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据