4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

The direct influence of the support on the electronic structure of the active sites in supported metal catalysts: evidence from Pt-H anti-bonding shape resonance and Pt-COFTIR data

期刊

TOPICS IN CATALYSIS
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 35-42

出版社

BALTZER SCI PUBL BV
DOI: 10.1023/A:1009067712537

关键词

XAFS spectroscopy; Pt-H anti-bonding shape resonance; metal-support interaction; Pt-H bonding; FTIR of chemisorbed CO; TOF of neopentane hydrogenolysis; support alkalinity; Pt/SiO2; Pt and Pd/LTL; Pt/Y

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The catalytic activity and spectroscopic properties of supported noble metal catalysts are strongly influenced by support properties such as the presence of protons, type of charge compensating cations, Si/Al ratio and/or presence of extra-framework Al. The metal-support interaction is relatively independent of the metal (Pd or Pt) or the type of support (microporous zeolites such as LTL and Y or macroporous supports such as SiO2). As the alkalinity of the support increases (i.e., with increasing electronic charge on the support oxygen ions), the TOF of the metal particles for neopentane hydrogenolysis decreases. At the same time, there is a systematic shift from Linear to bridge bonded CO as indicated by the IR spectra. This is a strong indication of a change in the electronic structure of the catalytically active Pt surface atoms. Analysis of the Pt-H anti-bonding shape resonance present in the Pt X-ray absorption spectra of the L-3 edge indicates that the difference in energy between the Pt-H anti-bonding orbital and the Fermi level decreases as the alkalinity of the support increases. The results from the IR and Pt-H shape resonance data directly show that the support influences the position in energy of the metal valence orbitals. The ionisation potential of the catalytically active Pt surface atoms decreases with increasing support alkalinity, i.e., with increasing electron charge on the support oxygen ions. This shift leads to a weakening of the Pt-H bond.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据