4.6 Article

Reading Salt Activates Gustatory Brain Regions: fMRI Evidence for Semantic Grounding in a Novel Sensory Modality

期刊

CEREBRAL CORTEX
卷 22, 期 11, 页码 2554-2563

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhr324

关键词

fMRI; gustatory cortex; language; reading; semantic network; taste

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Education [CSD2007-00012]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [PSI 2009-10067, PSI2010-20168]
  3. Medical Research Council (UK) [U1055.04.003.00001.01]
  4. MRC [MC_U105580445] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Medical Research Council [MC_U105580445] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Because many words are typically used in the context of their referent objects and actions, distributed cortical circuits for these words may bind information about their form with perceptual and motor aspects of their meaning. Previous work has demonstrated such semantic grounding for sensorimotor, visual, auditory, and olfactory knowledge linked to words, which is manifest in activation of the corresponding areas of the cortex. Here, we explore the brain basis of gustatory semantic links of words whose meaning is primarily related to taste. In a blocked functional magnetic resonance imaging design, Spanish taste words and control words matched for a range of factors (including valence, arousal, imageability, frequency of use, number of letters and syllables) were presented to 59 right-handed participants in a passive reading task. Whereas all the words activated the left inferior frontal (BA44/45) and the posterior middle and superior temporal gyri (BA21/22), taste-related words produced a significantly stronger activation in these same areas and also in the anterior insula, frontal operculum, lateral orbitofrontal gyrus, and thalamus among others. As these areas comprise primary and secondary gustatory cortices, we conclude that the meaning of taste words is grounded in distributed cortical circuits reaching into areas that process taste sensations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据