4.2 Article

Canada's plant hardiness zones revisited using modern climate interpolation techniques

期刊

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE
卷 81, 期 1, 页码 129-143

出版社

AGR INST CANADA
DOI: 10.4141/P00-030

关键词

plant hardiness; thin plate splines; climate mapping; spatial analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Canada's plant hardiness zones are well known to Canadian gardeners. The original hardiness indices and zones were developed in the early 1960's through regression models of several climatic parameters and plant survival data from numerous locations across the country. Since that time Canada's climate has changed and climate interpolation techniques have improved. We have remapped Canada's plant hardiness zones using data from the period of the original analysis (roughly 1930-1960) and for the 1961-1990 period using thin plate spline interpolation methods. Trials of bivariate and tri-variate splines were undertaken and evaluated using withheld data. A trivariate function of position (longitude and latitude) and elevation performed best. Standard errors of the surfaces were about 0.5 degreesC or less for temperature variables and 5 to 28% for rainfall depending on the month (winter months bring the worst). The creation of a new digital elevation model (a regular grid of position and elevation) of Canada enabled the mapping of each variable required for the plant hardiness formula at spatial resolutions of 1 km to 10 km. These models better capture the spatial variation in climate than previously possible and hence should provide a stronger basis for applications such as the determination of plant hardiness zones. Comparisons of the zones between the two time periods are consistent with what is known about climate in Canada. The hardiness index has declined or has stayed stable in eastern Canada and has increased in western areas. The results also suggest that more station data are required in western Canada to better capture the inherent spatial variability of climate, particularly precipitation, in mountainous terrain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据