4.6 Article

Rac1-Dependent Cell Cycle Exit of MGE Precursors and GABAergic Interneuron Migration to the Cortex

期刊

CEREBRAL CORTEX
卷 22, 期 3, 页码 680-692

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhr145

关键词

cortical development; inhibitory interneurons; Rho-GTPases

资金

  1. European Union [39528]
  2. Royal Society of the UK
  3. IMBB
  4. University of Crete
  5. Medical Research Council
  6. European Research Council
  7. MRC [MC_U117537087, MC_U117527252, G0501173] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Medical Research Council [G0501173, MC_U117527252, MC_U117537087] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cortical gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic interneurons are characterized by extraordinary neurochemical and functional diversity. Although recent studies have uncovered some of the molecular components underlying interneuron development, including the cellular and molecular mechanisms guiding their migration to the cortex, the intracellular components involved are still unknown. Rac1, a member of the Rac subfamily of Rho-GTPases, has been implicated in various cellular processes such as cell cycle dynamics, axonogenesis, and migration. In this study, we have addressed the specific role of Rac1 in interneuron progenitors originating in the medial ganglionic eminence, via Cre/loxP technology. We show that ablation of Rac1 from Nkx2.1-positive progenitors, results in a migratory impairment. As a consequence, only half of GABAergic interneurons are found in the postnatal cortex. The rest remain aggregated in the ventral telencephalon and show morphological defects in their growing processes in vitro. Ablation of Rac1 from postmitotic progenitors does not result in similar defects, thus underlying a novel cell autonomous and stage-specific requirement for Rac1 activity, within proliferating progenitors of cortical interneurons. Rac1 is necessary for their transition from G1 to S phase, at least in part by regulating cyclin D levels and retinoblastoma protein phosphorylation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据