4.3 Article

Calpain inhibitor, SJA6017, reduces the rate of formation of selenite cataract in rats

期刊

CURRENT EYE RESEARCH
卷 22, 期 4, 页码 280-285

出版社

SWETS ZEITLINGER PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1076/ceyr.22.4.280.5505

关键词

calpain; cataract; selenite; SJA6017

资金

  1. NEI NIH HHS [EY03600] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE [R01EY003600] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purposes. 1) To measure the amount of calpain inhibitor SJA6017 taken up by lenses of young rats after administration; and 2) To test efficacy of SJA6017 against selenite cataract in regard to amelioration of proteolysis of lens protein and prevention of lens nuclear opacity. Methods. Selenite nuclear cataracts were produced by subcutaneous injection of an overdose of sodium selenite to 16-day-old rats. SJA6017 was administered daily using intraperitoneal injections at 100 mg/kg body weight/day for 4 days. Lenses were observed and photographed by slit lamp biomicroscopy, and scored into one of three stages. Enucleated lenses were also scored into one of four stages and lens opacities in the nuclear region were quantified by image analysis. Proteolysis of crystallins was detected by SDS-PAGE. The amount of SJA6017 taken up by the lens was detected with a column switching HPLC system. Results. Nuclear cataracts were visible in 31% of the animals receiving only selenite, while the frequency of nuclear cataract in the Se SJA6017 group was reduced to only 16%. This effect of SJA6017 was confirmed by densitometric analysis as a reduction in the density of the nucleus. Similar proteolytic changes of crystallins occurred at all stages of selenite cataract formation. The amount of SJA6017 in the lens was detected at the level of 0.03 muM. Conclusions. Systemic SJA6017 was taken up by the lens, and SJA6017 ameliorated in vivo selenite cataract formation. These studies are important because they partially validate the biochemical rationale for developing non-surgical, drug treatments for cataract prevention in man.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据