4.5 Article

Stroop performance in focal lesion patients: dissociation of processes and frontal lobe lesion location

期刊

NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
卷 39, 期 8, 页码 771-786

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00013-6

关键词

stroop; focal lesion; frontal lobes; brain-behavior relations

资金

  1. DS NIH HHS [NINDS 26985] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There were three primary objectives: to examine the usefulness of the Stroop interference effect as a measure of frontal lobe function; to investigate the possibility of distinct lesion effects for word reading or color naming; and to specifically determine the brain regions necessary for the performance of the incongruent condition. Fifty-one patients with single focal brain lesions in frontal and non-frontal regions and 26 normal control subjects (CTL) were administered the word reading, color naming and incongruent conditions of the Stroop task. Only frontal lesions produced significant impairment. Patients with posterior lesions were not significantly deficient in any condition. Damage to the left dorsolateral frontal lobe resulted in increased errors and slowness in response speed for color naming. Contrary to Ferret (Neuropsychology, 1974; 12: 323-330), lesions of the left frontal lobe did not result in a selective interference deficit on the Stroop incongruent condition. Father, bilateral superior medial frontal damage was associated with increased errors and slowness in response time for the incongruent condition, This result is interpreted as failure of maintenance of consistent activation of the intended response in the incongruent Stroop condition. The results and conclusion are compatible with the prevalent theories of both the Stroop effect and the role of the superior medial frontal regions. The role of the anterior cingulate cortex on performance of the Stroop task is likely related to task and patient context. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据