4.6 Article

Prefrontal Cortical Contribution to Risk-Based Decision Making

期刊

CEREBRAL CORTEX
卷 20, 期 8, 页码 1816-1828

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhp250

关键词

anterior cingulate; orbitofrontal cortex; prelimbic cortex; reversible inactivation; rat

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP-89861]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  3. Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Damage to various regions of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) impairs decision making involving evaluations about risks and rewards. However, the specific contributions that different PFC subregions make to risk-based decision making are unclear. We investigated the effects of reversible inactivation of 4 subregions of the rat PFC (prelimbic medial PFC, orbitofrontal cortex [OFC], anterior cingulate, and insular cortex) on probabilistic (or risk) discounting. Rats were well trained to choose between either a Small/Certain lever that always delivered 1 food pellet, or another, Large/Risky lever, which delivered 4 pellets, but the probability of receiving reward decreased across 4 trial blocks (100%, 50%, 25%, and 12.5%). Infusions of gama-aminobutyric acid agonists muscimol/baclofen into the medial PFC increased risky choice. However, similar medial PFC inactivations decreased risky choice when the Large/Risky reward probability increased over a session. OFC inactivation increased response latencies in the latter trial blocks without affecting choice. Anterior cingulate or insular inactivations were without effect. The effects of prelimbic inactivations were not attributable to disruptions in response flexibility or judgments about the relative value of probabilistic rewards. Thus, the prelimbic, but not other PFC regions, plays a critical role in risk discounting, integrating information about changing reward probabilities to update value representations that facilitate efficient decision making.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据