4.3 Article

Selective distribution of oxysterols in atherosclerotic lesions and human plasma lipoproteins

期刊

FREE RADICAL RESEARCH
卷 34, 期 5, 页码 485-497

出版社

HARWOOD ACAD PUBL GMBH
DOI: 10.1080/10715760100300431

关键词

oxysterols; atherosclerosis; human lesion; E-o mice; LDL; HDL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The presence of oxidized sterols (oxysterols) in human serum and lesions has been linked to the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis. Data concerning the origin, identity and quantity of oxysterols in biological samples are controversial and inconsistent. This inconsistency may arise from different analytical methods or handling conditions used by different investigators. In the present study, oxysterol levels and distribution were analyzed by an optimized GC-MS method, in human atherosclerotic coronary and carotid lesions, in atherosclerotic apolipoprotein E deficient mice (E degrees mice) and in native and in vitro oxidized human low and high density lipoproteins. Oxysterol levels were analyzed with a limit of detection of 0.06 - 0.24 ng, with 25-hydroxycholesterol (25-OH) being the least sensitive. In human coronary and carotid lesions, obtained from endatherectomic samples, 27-hydroxycholesterol (27-OH) was the major oxysterol, with about 85% as sterols esterified to fatty acids. While total cholesterol and oxysterols levels; were similar in both kinds of human lesions, oxysterol distribution was significantly different. In coronary lesions the mean levels of 27-OH and 7 beta -hydroxycholesterol (7 beta -OH) were 38% and 20% of total oxysterols, whereas in carotid lesions their mean levels were 66% and 5%, respectively. Unlike in human aortic lesions, 27-OH was entirely absent in E degrees mice, whereas the level of 7 alpha -hydroxycholesterol (7 alpha -OH) was 28% of the total oxysterols, vs. 5% in human coronary lesions. As 27-OH is an enzymatic product of cholesterol oxidation, this finding may indicate that such an enzymatic process does not take place in E degrees mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据