4.2 Article

Concordance in judgments among c-erbB-2 (HER2/neu) overexpression detected by two immunohistochemical tests and gene amplification detected by Southern blot hybridization in breast carcinoma

期刊

PATHOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
卷 51, 期 1, 页码 26-32

出版社

BLACKWELL SCIENCE ASIA
DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1827.2001.01163.x

关键词

breast cancer; c-erbB-2 (HER2/neu); gene amplification; HercepTest(TM); immunohistochemistry; interobserver agreement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We compared the c-erbB-2 protein overexpression status detected by the HercepTest(TM) (DAKO A/S, Grostrup, Denmark) with another conventional immunohistochemistry system using an anti-c-erbB-2 rabbit polyclonal antibody (Nichirei Co., Tokyo, Japan) and with the c-erbB-2 gene amplification status detected by Southern blot hybridization in 101 surgically resected breast carcinomas. According to the criteria for overexpression, recommended by the manufacturer, c-erbB-2 overexpression by HercepTest(TM) was detected in 24 cancers (24%), comprising six score-2 tumors and 18 score-3 tumors. The level of agreement in judgment of the HercepTest(TM), among three independent observers, was excellent (kappa = 0.845). C-erbB-2 overexpression by Nichirei's antibody and c-erbB-2 gene amplification were detected in 21% and 16% of cases, respectively, and their concordance with HercepTest(TM) scores of 2-3 was 89% and 90%, respectively. In the score-3 cases by Hercep Test(TM) only, the concordance rates with overexpression by Nichirei's immunohistochemistry and with gene amplification were slightly higher, 94% and 93%, respectively. Score-2 cases by HercepTest(TM) were mostly judged as negative overexpression by Nichirei's antibody and as no amplification by Southern blot hybridization. The present results showed that HercepTest(TM) score-3 detected c-erbB-2 overexpression almost optimally as well as the conventional methods and the score-3 breast carcinomas had clinical and biological implications. Further examination would be necessary to decide the significance of breast cancers of HercepTest(TM) score 2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据