4.6 Article

From Phonemes to Articulatory Codes: An fMRI Study of the Role of Broca's Area in Speech Production

期刊

CEREBRAL CORTEX
卷 19, 期 9, 页码 2156-2165

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhn239

关键词

articulation; fMRI; left inferior frontal gyrus; pars opercularis; phonological processing

资金

  1. Neuroinformatics Doctoral Training Centre studentship
  2. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  3. Greek Bakalas Bros Foundation
  4. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders of the US National Institutes of Health
  5. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke of the US National Institutes of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We used event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate the neuroanatomical substrates of phonetic encoding and the generation of articulatory codes from phonological representations. Our focus was on the role of the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) and in particular whether the LIFG plays a role in sublexical phonological processing such as syllabification or whether it is directly involved in phonetic encoding and the generation of articulatory codes. To answer this question, we contrasted the brain activation patterns elicited by pseudowords with high- or low-sublexical frequency components, which we expected would reveal areas related to the generation of articulatory codes but not areas related to phonological encoding. We found significant activation of a premotor network consisting of the dorsal precentral gyrus, the inferior frontal gyrus bilaterally, and the supplementary motor area for low- versus high-sublexical frequency pseudowords. Based on our hypothesis, we concluded that these areas and in particular the LIFG are involved in phonetic and not phonological encoding. We further discuss our findings with respect to the mechanisms of phonetic encoding and provide evidence in support of a functional segregation of the posterior part of Broca's area, the pars opercularis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据