4.6 Review

Development of Anterior Cingulate Functional Connectivity from Late Childhood to Early Adulthood

期刊

CEREBRAL CORTEX
卷 19, 期 3, 页码 640-657

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhn117

关键词

anterior cingulate; BA 25; development; functional connectivity; self-regulation

资金

  1. Stavros S. Niarchos Foundation
  2. Leon Lowenstein Foundation
  3. NARSAD (The Mental Health Research Association)
  4. Linda and Richard Schaps
  5. Jill and Bob Smith
  6. Taubman Foundation gifts

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human cerebral development is remarkably protracted. Although microstructural processes of neuronal maturation remain accessible only to morphometric post-mortem studies, neuroimaging tools permit the examination of macrostructural aspects of brain development. The analysis of resting-state functional connectivity (FC) offers novel possibilities for the investigation of cerebral development. Using seed-based FC methods, we examined the development of 5 functionally distinct cingulate-based intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs) in children (n = 14, 10.6 +/- 1.5 years), adolescents (n = 12, 15.4 +/- 1.2) and young adults (n = 14, 22.4 +/- 1.2). Children demonstrated a more diffuse pattern of correlation with voxels proximal to the seed region of interest (ROI) (local FC''), whereas adults exhibited more focal patterns of FC, as well as a greater number of significantly correlated voxels at long distances from the seed ROI. Adolescents exhibited intermediate patterns of FC. Consistent with evidence for different maturational time courses, ICNs associated with social and emotional functions exhibited the greatest developmental effects. Our findings demonstrate the utility of FC for the study of developing functional organization. Moreover, given that ICNs are thought to have an anatomical basis in neuronal connectivity, measures of FC may provide a quantitative index of brain maturation in healthy subjects and those with neurodevelopmental disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据