4.4 Article

Developmental Gene Expression Profile of Axon Guidance Cues in Purkinje Cells During Cerebellar Circuit Formation

期刊

CEREBELLUM
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 307-317

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12311-014-0548-5

关键词

Purkinje; Development; Gene expression; Axon guidance cues; Cell sorting

资金

  1. Human Frontier Science Program Organization [CDA-0015-2006-C]
  2. INSERM-AVENIR program
  3. Foundation Fyssen
  4. Federation pour la recherche sur le cerveau (FRC)
  5. Fondation pour la recherche Medicale (FRM)
  6. ANR [ANR-08-JCJC-0044]
  7. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-08-JCJC-0044] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The establishment of precise neural circuits during development involves a variety of contact-mediated and secreted guidance molecules that are expressed in a complementary fashion by different cell types. To build a functional circuit, each cell type must first trigger an intrinsic genetic program that is led by their environment at a key time point. It is therefore essential to identify the different cell-specific and stage-specific transcriptional profiles expressed by neurons. However, very few studies have been done to address this issue thus far. Herein, we have carried out a large-scale quantitative real-time PCR analysis of all classical axon guidance molecules (i.e., Semaphorins, Netrins, Ephrins, and Slits) and their receptors expressed by Purkinje cells (PCs) at specific stages of postnatal cerebellar development in vivo. Most cerebellar connections are setup in a well-characterized sequential manner during postnatal development and lead to the fine regulation of the PC, the sole output of the structure. Our analysis of the relative expression of these guidance cues has uncovered a dynamic expression pattern corresponding to specific stages of cerebellar development, thus providing a starting point for studying the role of these axon guidance molecules in cerebellar wiring.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据