4.4 Article

IMIRS: a high-resolution 3D reconstruction package integrated with a relational image database

期刊

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
卷 137, 期 3, 页码 292-304

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/S1047-8477(02)00014-X

关键词

image database; SQL; electron cryomicroscopy; single particle reconstruction; icosahedral reconstruction; high resolution; high throughput

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R01AI046420] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI46420] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent advances in electron cryomicroscopy instrumentation and single particle reconstruction have created opportunities for high-throughput and high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) structure determination of macromolecular complexes. However, it has become impractical and inefficient to rely on conventional text file data management and command-line programs to organize and process the increasing numbers of image data required in high-resolution studies. Here, we present a distributed relational database for managing complex datasets and its integration into our high-resolution software package IMIRS (Image Management and Icosahedral Reconstruction System). IMIRS consists of a complete set of modular programs for icosahedral reconstruction organized under a graphical user interface and provides options for user-friendly, step-by-step data processing as well as automatic reconstruction. We show that the integration of data management with processing in IMIRS automates the tedious tasks of data management, enables data coherence, and facilitates information sharing in a distributed computer and user environment without significantly increasing the time of program execution. We demonstrate the applicability of IMIRS in icosahedral reconstruction toward high resolution by using it to obtain an 8-Angstrom 3D structure of an intermediate-sized dsRNA virus. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据