4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

The value of improving the productivity of the drug development process - Faster times and better decisions

期刊

PHARMACOECONOMICS
卷 20, 期 -, 页码 1-10

出版社

ADIS INTERNATIONAL LTD
DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200220003-00001

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: This study examines the financial benefits that can accrue to drug developers from improvements in the drug development process. The effect on drug development costs from faster development, earlier decisions on project failures, and higher approval success rates are quantified. Data and Methods: The results from a recent study of research and development (R&D) costs for new drugs are used as a benchmark against which improvements in the discovery and development processes are simulated. The cost results in the benchmark study were based on a sample of 68 randomly selected investigational drugs from 10 pharmaceutical firms. Results: Simultaneous 25% reductions in phase lengths lower capitalised total cost per approved drug by 16%, or $US 129 million; 50% reductions in time lower cost by 29%, or $US235 million. Earlier decisions to terminate research on drugs that will ultimately fail significantly reduce clinical costs. For example, shifting 5% of all clinical failures from phase III/regulatory review to phase I reduces out-of-pocket clinical costs by 5.5 to 71%; and capitalised clinical cost is lowered by 5.1 to 6.3%. If more productive discovery programmes or better preclinical screens increase success rates from 21.5% to one in three, firms can reduce capitalised total cost per approved drug by $US221 million to $US242 million. Conclusions: Whether faster development times, quicker termination decisions or higher success rates derive from public policy initiatives, better management, or new technologies, the impact on R&D costs can be substantial. Ultimately, the increased efficiency could result-in more innovation and new therapies reaching patients sooner.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据