4.6 Article

Integration of bilateral whisker stimuli in rats: Role of the whisker barrel cortices

期刊

CEREBRAL CORTEX
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 86-97

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/12.1.86

关键词

-

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL &CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH [R01DE013810] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [F31MH012570] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NIDCR NIH HHS [DE11121-01, DE-13810-01] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIMH NIH HHS [MH12570-01A1] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, we demonstrated that neural responses within the whisker region of the primary somatosensory cortex (Slw) of rats are profoundly influenced by the spatiotemporal attributes of ipsilateral, as well as contralateral, whisker stimuli. As inactivation of one Slw eliminates in the intact Slw both ipsilaterally evoked responses and the influence of ipsilateral stimulation on contralaterally evoked activity, we proposed that interhemispheric interactions between the Slws may be important for integrating bilateral whisker information. To test whether rats can recognize the bilateral nature of a whisker stimulus, we developed a tactile discrimination task that required rats to conjointly determine distances to a left and a right discriminandum as equidistant or non-equidistant using only their facial whiskers. All rats trained in this task achieved performance levels indicative of an ability to integrate bilateral whisker information. Testing during unilateral, as well as bilateral, inactivation of the Slws indicated that rats rely on both Slws for detecting the bilateral nature of a whisker stimulus. Rats were unable to perform the task without both sets of whiskers, a fact that indicates that the whiskers (and not other modalities) were used to perform this task. The findings presented here indicate that rats can solve a task that requires the conjoint detection of left and right whisker-mediated distance information and implicate the Slws as central to this ability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据