4.2 Article

Toxoplasma gondii partially inhibits nitric oxide production of activated murine macrophages

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL PARASITOLOGY
卷 100, 期 1, 页码 62-70

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/expr.2001.4675

关键词

Toxoplasma gondii; Trypanosoma cruzi; macrophages; monocytes; deactivation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Activated macrophages produce nitric oxide (NO) and as such are able to control the multiplication of Toxoplasma gondii. Until now. no reports have described a possible modulation of NO production of macrophages after T. gondii infection. To investigate this possibility, murine blood monocyte-derived and peritoneal macrophages were activated in vitro with interferon-gamma and lipopolysaccharide and infected with T. gondii and Trypanosoma cruzi. and NO production was evaluated. NO was produced by monocyte-derived macrophages only if cultured in the presence of macrophage-colony-stimulating factor. Monocyte-derived or peritoneal macrophages infected with T. gondii presented a significant reduction in NO production. NO production inhibition was not detected after T. cruzi infection. Macrophages infected with higher T gondii/macrophage ratios presented lower NO production. Furthermore, only viable T. gondii could cause partial inhibition of NO production. In macrophages activated 24 h before the interaction, partial inhibition was detected after 3 h of infection and continued for 48 h. In macrophages activated immediately after the interaction. partial inhibition was not detected at 12 h. but was observed at 24 h. T. gondii-infected macrophages present lower inducible nitric oxide synthase expression as assayed by immunofluorescence. T. gondii did not develop in monocyte-derived macrophages producing NO, but were not totally eliminated. These results demonstrate that T. gondii infection partially inhibits NO production by murine macrophages, suggesting that a deactivating macrophage mechanism may be used for better survival into phagocytic cells. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science (USA).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据