4.5 Article

Different preservation of myocardial capillary endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes during and after cardioplegic ischemia (25 degrees C) of canine hearts

期刊

PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE
卷 198, 期 4, 页码 281-290

出版社

URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1078/0344-0338-00255

关键词

heart; ischemia; cardiolegia; reperfusion; stereology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Complete resumption of cardiac function after cardioplegic arrest presupposes a well-preserved myocardial ultrastructure during and after ischemia. Therefore, we determined ischemia-induced ultrastructural alterations in the myocardium during and after reversible cardioplegic ischemia using stereological methods. Cardiac arrest was induced with St. Thomas' Hospital- or Custodiol (HTK) solution. Reperfusion with Tyrode's solution followed after reversible cardioplegic ischemia in situ. Samples were taken 1) from beating hearts, 2) from cardioplegically arrested hearts immediately after the end of coronary perfusion, 3) from ischemic hearts incubated in the cardioplegic solution at 25 degreesC, and 4) from reperfused beating hearts after ischemia in situ at 22 degreesC. Cellular swelling was determined as the barrier thickness of capillary endothelium and as the sum of cardiomyocyte volume fractions of free sarcoplasm and mitochondria. In St. Thomas'-arrested hearts, intra-ischemic volume increase was significantly more pronounced in endothelial cells than in cardiomyocytes. Reperfusion at the intraischemic practical limit of resuscitability (ATP levels of 4 pmol/g..) significantly reduced intraischemic swelling of cardiomyocytes, but not of capillary endothelial cells. Mitochondrial damage was more pronounced in capillary endothelial cells during ischemia and after reperfusion. Thus, after reversible cardioplegic arrest, structural recovery of cardiomyocytes is better than that of capillary endothelial cells. An incomplete structural protection of capillary endothelial cells may predominantly contribute to postischemic dysfunction in the reperfused heart.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据