4.4 Article

Relative contributions of NO and gap junctional communication to endothelium-dependent relaxations of rabbit resistance arteries vary with vessel size

期刊

MICROVASCULAR RESEARCH
卷 63, 期 1, 页码 115-128

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/mvre.2001.2352

关键词

gap junctions; connexin; nitric oxide; endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF); HeLa cells; green fluorescent protein (GFP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two synthetic peptide inhibitors of gap junctional communication have been used to compare the contribution of direct cell-cell coupling to acetylcholine-induced relaxations of the rabbit central ear artery (G(0)) and its second branch generation (G(2)). These peptides, designated (43)Gap 26 and (37,43)Gap 27, possess sequence homology with specific domains of the first extracellular loop of connexin 43 (Cx43) and second extracellular loop of Cxs 37 and 43, respectively. Immunohistochemistry confirmed the presence of Cxs 37, 40, and 43 in the vascular endothelium, but of only Cx43 in the media of G(0). At concentrations of 300 muM, (43)Gap 26 and (37,43)Gap 27 each inhibited the maximum response to acetylcholine in G(2) by similar to50%, but by only similar to20% in G(0) whereas inhibition of NO synthesis by 300 muM N-G-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester attenuated maximum relaxations to acetylcholine by similar to30% in G(2), but by similar to70% in G(0) Residual endothelium-derived hyperpolanizing factor-type responses in G(0) and G(2) were abolished by (43)Gap 26 and (37,43)Gap 27. In HeLa cells transfected to express a chimeric Cx43-green fluorescent protein that forms functional gap junctions, the peptides were equally effective inhibitors of Lucifer yellow dye transfer. We conclude that the contribution of gap junctions to endothelium-dependent relaxation is inversely related to vessel size and exhibits an apparently reciprocal relationship with NO-mediated mechanisms of vasorelaxation in the rabbit ear. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据