4.3 Article

Behavioral analysis of CREB alpha Delta mutation on a B6/129 F1 hybrid background

期刊

HIPPOCAMPUS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 18-26

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hipo.10003

关键词

hippocampus; amygdala; mouse genetics; learning and memory; inbred strains

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH060244] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG018199, T32AG000256] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [R01DA011649] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NIA NIH HHS [5T32 AG-00256, AG-18199] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NIDA NIH HHS [DA-11649] Funding Source: Medline
  6. NIMH NIH HHS [MH-60244] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cyclic AMP (cAMP)-response element binding protein (CREB) is an activity-dependent transcription factor that plays a role in synaptic plasticity and memory storage in Aplysia, Drosophila, and rodents. Mice with targeted deletions of two CREB isoforms (alpha and Delta; CREB alphaDelta mice) have been characterized on a mixed genetic background of C57BL/6 (B6) and 129/SvEv (129), as well as on a defined F1 hybrid of B6 and FVB/N, and these results suggest that the phenotype of CREB A mice depends critically on genetic background. In an examination of the hypothesis that the role of CREB in learning and memory can be influenced by strain differences, we analyzed mice with the CREB alphaDelta mutation on an F1 hybrid background of B6 and 129 strains. CREB alphaDelta mice on this background had impaired short-term and long-term cued and contextual fear conditioning and normal spatial learning in the Morris water maze. Our results suggest that at least some aspects of hippocampal function are normal in CREB alphaDelta mice, and that CREB alphaDelta mice on the 136/129 F1 background have alterations in amygdala function. These studies underscore the importance of controlling for genetic background in the behavioral analysis of knockout and transgenic mice. (C) 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据