4.7 Article

Rational design of manganese dioxide decorated skeleton of colloidal mesoporous carbon nanocomposites for supercapacitors

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 40, 期 8, 页码 13381-13388

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.05.055

关键词

Nanocomposite; Manganese dioxide; Mesoporous carbon; Controlled synthesis; Supercapacitor

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51104194]
  2. Doctoral Fund of Ministry of Education of China [20110191120014]
  3. Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars [43]
  4. National Key laboratory of Fundamental Science of Micro/Nano-device and System Technology (Chongqing University) [2013MS06]
  5. State Education Ministry and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Chongqing University, PR China) [CDJZR12248801, CDJZR12135501, CDJAZ13130035]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Colloidal mesoporous carbon (MC) supported MnO2 nanocomposites have been synthesized via a facile and cost-effective strategy at room temperature. The structure and morphology of as-prepared nanocomposites are characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA), nitrogen adsorption, focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy (FIB/SEM) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM). The as-obtained three-dimensional architecture can be well controlled by tailoring preparative parameters (e.g., the ratio of KMnO4 and MC) and applied as supercapacitor electrodes. Cycle voltammetric (CV) and galvanostatic charge-discharge (GC) measurements present MC-MnO2 composites exhibit the optimized pseudocapacitance performance (270.5 F g(-1)) with newfangled cycling stability, and ideal rate capability owning to rational design of the novel nanostructures. In principle, these findings exhibit potential in developing long cycling and quick-charge/slow-discharge supercapacitors for practical applications. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd and Techna Group S.r.l. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据