4.2 Article

Development and validation of a scale to measure symptoms of chronic graft-versus-host disease

期刊

出版社

CARDEN JENNINGS PUBL CO LTD
DOI: 10.1053/bbmt.2002.v8.pm12234170

关键词

chronic graft-versus-host disease; stem-cell transplantation; quality of life; outcomes research

资金

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [K07CA075267] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NCI NIH HHS [CA75267-04] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic GVHD (cGVHD) affects 30% to 90% of surviving allogeneic transplant recipients. Thus far, no quality-of-life instruments have been developed to measure the effect of this common complication of allogeneic transplantation on patients' functioning and well-being. Using a prospective cohort of 107 patients with active cGVHD who completed the symptom scale at enrollment and at intervals of 3 and 6 months, we developed a 30-item symptom scale with 7 subscales to capture the cGVHD-specific symptom burden. The symptom scale correlated highly with patients' self-assessed mild, moderate, and severe cGVHD manifestations in cross-sectional analysis. Reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.79-0.90), test-retest (r(2) = 0.28-0.93), and convergent and discriminant validity compared to the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy with BAIT subscale (FACT-BMT) were assessed and found to be adequate. Longitudinal assessments showed that changes in overall health status correlated best with changes in quality of life as measured by the SF-36 and FACT-BAIT. In contrast, changes in cGVHD severity were best detected by changes in the symptom scale. We recommend that either the SF-36 or the FACT-BMT be combined with a cGVHD-specific symptom scale to measure the impact of cGVHD on patients' quality of life and that this endpoint be included in clinical trials testing cGVHD interventions. The cGVHD symptom scale is a short, simple, and valid measure of cGVHD manifestations and can be used to follow complication-specific symptoms using patient self-administered questionnaires.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据