4.3 Article

Self-thinning lines differ with fertility level

期刊

ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 17-28

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING ASIA
DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1703.2002.00459.x

关键词

allometric self-thinning; biomass packing; competition intensity; Ocicmum basilicum; root competition; self-thinning; shoot competition

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of variations in fertility level of the substrate on the self-thinning lines followed by populations of Ocimum basilicum L. was investigated experimentally by establishing populations over a range of densities at two fertility levels. Populations from each fertility level followed different self-thinning lines for shoot biomass. Self-thinning began at a lower biomass in populations grown at the higher fertility level; the subsequent slope of the thinning line was -0.5 for these stands on a log shoot biomass versus log density plot. The slope of the self-thinning line was flatter (-0.29) at the lower fertility level. Fitting the self-thinning line by the Structural Relationship rather than the Major Axis made little difference to line estimates. Biomass packing differed with fertility level, with plants from the higher fertility stands requiring more canopy volume for given shoot biomass than plants from lower fertility levels. Biologically, this would mean shoot competition intensified more rapidly at the higher fertility level as biomass accumulated in stands. The difference in slope between fertility levels was associated with changes above- and belowground. The radial extension of the canopy versus shoot mass relationships of individual plants differed with fertility level. Plants at the lower fertility level allocated more biomass to root growth, and had less leaf area per unit root length. The differences in slope of the self-thinning lines may have been because of differences in the radial extension of the canopy versus shoot mass relationships of individual plants at each fertility level, and/or to an increase in root competition at the lower fertility level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据