4.6 Article

Immunohistochemical study on expression of alpha-defensin and beta-defensin-2 expression in human buccal epithelia with candidiasis

期刊

ORAL DISEASES
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 37-41

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1034/j.1601-0825.2002.1o770.x

关键词

alpha-defensins (HNPs); beta-defensin-2 (HBD-2); candidiasis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN: It has been previously reported that x-defensin (HNPs) and beta-defensin-2 (HBD-2) peptides with antifungal and cytotoxic activities can be detected in oral carcinomas and the saliva of patients with oral carcinomas. The present study investigated the presence of HNPs and HBD-2 in oral epithelia with candidiasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tissue sections (4 mum) were prepared from biopsy and surgically removed specimens diagnosed as oral candidiasis (n = 10). The sections were examined immunohistochemically with antibodies directed against HNPs and HBD-2. RESULTS: Tissue sections of oral candidiasis were immunostained with antidefensin antibodies. Neutrophils in the inflamed lamina propria were positively immunostained with anti-HNPs antibody. The cytoplasm of cells in the upper spinous layer, in the lower spinous layer and in the parakeratinized layer of buccal epithelia with candidiasis was immunostained intensely with anti-HBD-2 antibody. In contrast, the expression of HBD-2 in the normal spinous layer was much weaker than that in oral candidiasis. No signals of HNPs were found in normal buccal epithelium. CONCLUSION: Buccal specimens from individuals with oral candidiasis show greater levels of expression of both HNPs and HBD-2. There might be a dual protection manner by defensins against fungal inflammation in infected buccal epithelia locally. Generally, HBD-2 signals have been found everywhere in the buccal epithelium; however, in an infected area, the signal intensity of HBD-2 has increased. HNPs signals have not been found in the normal buccal epithelium; however, HNPs signals have increased when the infection occurred.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据