4.7 Article

Effect of calcination temperature for magnesite on interaction of MgO-rich phases with boric acid

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 40, 期 1, 页码 1651-1660

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.07.056

关键词

Borate; Calcination temperature; Magnesium oxide; Magnesium borate hydrate; Basicity

资金

  1. JSPS Funding Program for Next-Generation World Leading Researchers (NEXT Program) [GR078]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnesia (MgO), which can be obtained by calcination of natural magnesite, is one of the most effective known sorbents for borate in aqueous solutions. Here we examine the effect of calcination temperature on sorption of borate for MgO-rich phases produced by calcination of magnesite at 873-1373 K. Calcination at or above 1273 K produced a single magnesium oxide phase, whereas basic magnesium carbonates (mMgCO(3)center dot nMg(OH)(2)center dot xH(2)O) formed in association with magnesium oxide at or below 1073 K. Calcination temperature directly affected the efficiency of decarbonation of magnesium carbonate, and the solubility and basicity of magnesium oxide in the resultant calcined products. These factors (along with the boron concentration) essentially control the immobilization mechanism of borate on the calcined MgO-rich phases. After sorption of borate on products calcined at lower temperatures, different types of basic magnesium carbonates were formed that are less effective at immobilizing borate. At low borate concentrations, under saturation for magnesium borate hydrate (Mg7B4O13 center dot 7H(2)O), co-precipitation of borate with Mg(OH)(2) predominates. However, as magnesium borate hydrate becomes supersaturated, both precipitation of Mg7B4O13 center dot 7H(2)O and co-precipitation with Mg(OH)(2) contribute significantly to borate immobilization. Calcination temperature is a key practical factor affecting the borate sorption efficiency by changing the immobilization mechanism. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd and Techna Group S.r.l. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据