4.0 Article

Nicotinamide modulates mitochondrial membrane potential and cysteine protease activity during cerebral vascular endothelial cell injury

期刊

JOURNAL OF VASCULAR RESEARCH
卷 39, 期 2, 页码 131-147

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000057762

关键词

apoptosis; cerebrovascular endothelial cells; cytochrome c; DNA fragmentation; mitogen-activated protein kinase; nitric oxide; phosphatidylserine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microvascular endothelial cell (EC) apoptosis or programmed cell death (PCD) during free radical injury may be involved in the development of cerebral ischemic and degenerative diseases. Yet, the cellular mechanisms that mediate cerebral EC injury require further definition. We therefore used the agent nicotinamide as an investigative tool in EC cultures to examine the role of free radical nitric oxide (NO)-induced PCD. EC injury was evaluated by the trypan blue dye exclusion method, DNA fragmentation, membrane phosphatidylserine (PS) exposure, cysteine protease activity, mitochondrial membrane potential, and mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation. We demonstrate that cerebrovascular PCD consists of two distinct pathways that involve the degradation of genomic DNA and the exposure of membrane PS residues. Each of these pathways is reversible in nature and is controlled independently by caspase 8, caspase 1, and caspase 3. As a cytoprotectant, nicotinamide is novel in the vascular system and functions at two levels. Nicotinamide not only maintains the mitochondrial membrane potential and the prevention of cytochrome c release, but also prevents the induction of caspase-8-, caspase-1- and caspase-3-like activities linked to the DNA repair enzyme poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase through mechanisms that are independent from the MAP kinase systems of p38 and JNK. The work begins to identify therapeutic strategies for the protection of the cerebral vasculature during both acute and chronic degenerative disorders. Copyright (C) 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据