4.7 Article

Two step hot pressing sintering of dense fine grained WC-Al2O3 composites

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 39, 期 5, 页码 5415-5425

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.12.049

关键词

Two step hot pressing; Microstructure-final; Mechanical properties; WC-Al2O3 composites

资金

  1. Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project [B602]
  2. Nanomaterials Research Special Foundation of Shanghai Science and Technology Committee [05nm05031]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

WC-40 vol% Al2O3 composites were prepared by high energy ball milling and the following two step hot pressing sintering (TSS). The tungsten carbide (WC) and commercial alumina (Al2O3) powders composed of amorphous Al2O3, boehmite (AlOOH) and chi-Al2O3 were used as the starting materials. The feasibility of two step sintering (TSS) method to WC-40 vol% Al2O3 composites was demonstrated, optimum TSS regime was discussed and phase transformation during TSS process was investigated. The results showed that both the pre-sintering at a proper first step temperature (T-1) to obtain a critical initial density and isothermal hot pressing at an appropriate second step temperature (T-2) to inhibit grain boundary migration (GBM) were of significant importance. When the as milled WC-40 vol% Al2O3 powders were hot pressed under TSS4 regime, a relative density of 99% and a grain size of 2.38 mu m were obtained, an excellent Vickers hardness of 19.71 GPa was achieved, combining a fracture toughness of 12 MPa m(1/2) with a flexural strength of 1285 MPa. Compared with the near full dense samples consolidated under CS1 regime (1540 degrees C for 90 min), the grain size decreased, the Vickers hardness, fracture toughness and flexural strength were all improved due to the refined microstructure and the transgranular fracture mode. The amorphous Al2O3, AlOOH and chi-Al2O3 x were transformed to alpha-Al2O3 completely during the sintering process. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd and Techna Group S.r.l. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据