4.5 Article

Impact of training dementia caregivers in sensitivity to nonverbal emotion signals

期刊

INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 25-38

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1041610202008256

关键词

dementia; nonverbal; emotion

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [S06GM054650] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [K07AG000921] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NIA NIH HHS [KO7 AG00921] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIGMS NIH HHS [1 SO6 GM54650] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ninety-one mid- to late-stage dementia patients residing in nursing homes, along with their staff caregivers, participated in a study designed to assess whether training caregivers in sensitivity to nonverbal communication could enhance mood and reduce symptoms in patients and improve psychological well-being in caregivers. Patients and staff at three nursing homes comprised three groups that were randomly assigned to either a nonverbal sensitivity group, a behavioral placebo group that received instruction in the cognitive and behavioral aspects of dementia, and a wait-list control. Training consisted of 10 one-hour sessions taught by a clinical psychologist using prepared materials. Patient measures, which were taken at baseline and at 4 three-week intervals, included patient symptomatology (depression, agitation, behavioral symptoms), as reported by the staff caregivers, and positive and negative facial expressions of emotion elicited during a face-to-face interview and coded by trained research staff. Results indicated that positive affect increased sharply during the first 6 weeks after intervention in the nonverbal group, with the placebo and wait-list controls showing no change. There was also a decline in negative affect across time for all groups. Effects with respect to patient symptomatology did not reach significance. Caregivers in both training groups showed a decline in symptomatology, whereas the wait-list control group did not.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据