4.7 Article

Thermal conversion of carbon fibres/polysiloxane composites to carbon fibres/ceramic composites

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 39, 期 4, 页码 3795-3802

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.10.219

关键词

Polysiloxanes; Carbon fibres; Ceramic matrix composites; Black glass ceramics

资金

  1. AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Materials Science and Ceramics - statute research [11.11.160.937]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this work is to investigate the thermal conversion of carbon fibres/polysiloxane composites to carbon fibres/ceramic composites. The conversion mechanism of four different resins to the ceramic phase in the presence of carbon fibres is investigated. The experiments were conducted in three temperature ranges, corresponding to composite manufacturing stages, namely up to 160 degrees C, 1000 degrees C and finally 1700 degrees C. The study reveals that the thermal conversion mechanism of pure resins in the presence of carbon fibres is similar to that without fibres up to 1000 degrees C. Above 1000 degrees C thermal decomposition occurs in both solid (composite matrix) and gas phases, and the presence of carbon fibres in resin matrix produces higher mass losses and higher porosity of the resulting composite samples in comparison to ceramic residue obtained from pure resin samples. XRD analysis shows that at temperature of 1700 degrees C composite matrices contain nanosized silicon carbide. SEM and EDS analyses indicate that due to the secondary decomposition of gaseous compounds released during pyrolysis a silicon carbide protective layer is created on the fibre surface and fibre matrix interface. Moreover, nanosized silicon carbide filaments crystallize in composite pores. Owing to the presence of the protective silicon carbide layer created from the gas phase on the fibre matrix interface, highly porous C/SiC composites show significantly high oxidation resistance. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd and Techna Group S.r.l. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据