4.4 Article

Possible involvement of toll-like receptor 4 in endothelial cell activation of larger vessels in response to lipopolysaccharide

期刊

PATHOBIOLOGY
卷 70, 期 1, 页码 18-25

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000066000

关键词

toll-like receptor; human umbilical vein endothelial cells; signaling; CD14, soluble; E-selectin; IL-6

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Toll-like receptors (TLRs) serve as recognition and signaling elements for bacterial substances. To examine the role of TLRs in endothelial cells of larger vessels in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced signaling, the expression and function of TLRs in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were analyzed. A high level of TLR4 mRNA expression was found in HUVEC, human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and human monocyte cell line THP-1 cells. Little or no TLR2 mRNA expression was observed in HUVEC. In contrast, strong TLR2 mRNA expression was observed in PBMC and THP-1 cells. Moderate and high levels of TLR1 mRNA expression were found in HUVEC, PBMC and THP-1 cells, respectively. TLR3 mRNA expression was moderate in PBMC but weak in HUVEC and THP-1 cells. Little or no TLR5 and RP105 mRNA expression was observed in HUVEC, whereas a moderate level was detected in PBMC and THP-1 cells. The LPS-induced E-selectin expression in HUVEC was significantly inhibited by pretreatment with an anti-TLR4 mAb. Preincubation of HUVEC with an anti-TLR4 mAb significantly reduced the LPS-induced IL-6 production. LPS induced E-selectin and IL-6 production by HUVEC only in the presence of human serum, suggesting the involvement of soluble CD14. Anti-CD14 mAb strongly inhibited the LPS-induced E-selectin and IL-6 production by HUVEC. The inhibition with the concomitant treatment with anti-TLR4 and anti-CD14 mAbs was stronger than that with anti-CD14 mAb only, although it was slight. These results show that TLR4 in the presence of soluble CD14 plays a major role in the signaling of LPS in endothelial cells of larger vessels. Copyright (C) 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据