4.6 Article

Relation between depression and anxiety in dystonic patients: Implications for clinical management

期刊

DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY
卷 16, 期 3, 页码 100-103

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/da.10039

关键词

depression; anxiety disorders; comorbidity; psychopathology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Past clinical research has identified depression as the most common psychiatric disorder associated with cervical dystonia (CD). The purpose of our study is to document different patterns of psychopathology, the frequency of psychiatric disorders, and possible correlation with the neurological disorder in patients with CD. Forty patients with CD were investigated to assess levels of psychopathology on two self-rated scales. the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Symptom Check List (SCL-90). To determine the presence of psychiatric disorders, the patients were evaluated using the standard instrument in the DSM-III-R (Structured Clinical Interview Schedule, SCID). A small group of dystonic patients (12%) bad higher levels of psychopathology, with significant amounts of concomitant anxiety and depression on the BDI and SCL-90. SCID criteria for at least one psychiatric disorder were fulfilled in 22 patients (55%), including both the lifetime and current diagnoses. The most frequent diagnostic categories were anxiety (40%) and major depressive disorders (37.5%). In 17 patients (42.5%), criteria for at least one lifetime diagnosis were fulfilled prior to the onset of CD. Psychiatric evaluation does not indicate one specific disorder associated with CD. The presence of anxiety and depression symptoms before and during the course of dystonia, without a possible causal relationship, could mean that the alteration of a chain of physiological events in the central nervous system may not lead to a single clinical picture. The relatively high overall lifetime prevalence of anxiety and depressive disorders may indicate the need for a broader diagnostic and therapeutic approach, to patients with focal dystonia. (C) 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据