4.7 Article

The flow behavior, thixotropy and dynamical viscoelasticity of fenugreek gum

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING
卷 166, 期 -, 页码 21-28

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.05.015

关键词

Fenugreek gum (FG); Rheological models; Thixotropic index; Dynamical viscoelastic properties; Multiwave temperature ramp analysis

资金

  1. earmarked fund for National Key Technology MID Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2012BAD20B06-07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To discover the potential functionalities of fenugreek gum (FG) in food applications and pharmaceutical industry, steady-shear flow, thixotropy and dynamical viscoelasticity tests were systemically carried out under a range of FG concentration (0.05-2.0%, w/v) and temperature (0-80 degrees C). The results showed that FG aqueous solutions exhibited Newtonian plateaus followed by shear-thinning regions which were found to be well correlated to the Carreau model. It was also found that the pseudoplastic behaviors of the FG aqueous solutions exhibited a concentration dependence. When the concentration of FG was above 1%, the system exhibited a gel-like behavior. Dynamical viscoelastic properties also showed a solid, elastic-like viscoelastic behavior. While solution with FG concentration of 0.05% exhibited a transition from a fluid-like to gel-like structure. The variation of the thixotropic index alpha as a function of FG concentration showed a stronger thixotropic behavior as the polymer concentration increased, which indicated a typical elastic behavior of FG solutions with high concentration. Multiwave temperature ramp test for 1.0% (w/v) FG aqueous solution showed that the solid-like behavior had a strong dependence on frequency rather than temperature, which was consistent with the results of oscillatory frequency sweep test. These results could provide a useful indicator for the applications of FG in food industry and other fields. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据