4.4 Article

Fear, disgust, and information processing in specific phobia: The application of signal detection theory

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS
卷 16, 期 5, 页码 495-510

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0887-6185(02)00168-8

关键词

blood-injection-injury phobias; signal detection theory; discrimination ability; response bias

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A growing body of research suggests that individuals with small animal and blood-injection-injury (BII) phobias respond to phobia-relevant stimuli with a combination of fear and disgust. Despite the recognition that disgust may serve a functional role in phobic avoidance behavior, little is known about biased information processing for disgust-related material. Two studies examined recognition memory, using signal detection analyses, for phobia-relevant and general disgust pictures. Study 1 failed to find differences between spider phobics, BII phobics, and nonphobics in discrimination ability (d') and response bias (c) for spider, surgical, and two categories of general disgust Pictures. Results indicated that all participants responded in a liberal manner toward surgical and disgust pictures, whereas they responded more conservatively when judging spider pictures. Study 2 also failed to find differences between BII phobics and nonphobics in discrimination ability and response bias for surgical and disgust pictures presented at 500 and 50 ms exposure durations. All participants again adopted a liberal response bias toward Surgical and disgust Pictures, although only under the 500 ins stimulus presentation condition, These results do not suggest the presence of preferential information processing of phobia-relevant or general disgust elicitors among phobic participants, The functional value Of disgust-mediated information processing biases is questioned given the available literature, Implications and suggestions for continued information processing research for fearful and disgusting stimuli in specific phobia are outlined. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据