4.7 Article

Potential use of pulsed electric technologies and ultrasounds to improve the recovery of high-added value compounds from blackberries

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING
卷 167, 期 -, 页码 38-44

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.02.001

关键词

Blackberries; High voltage electrical discharges; Green extraction; Nutraceuticals; Emerging technologies

资金

  1. Valencian Autonomous Government (Conselleria dEducacio, Cultura i Esport. Generalitat Valenciana) [APOSTD/2013/092]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A better knowledge of the effect of non-conventional extraction technologies, which can avoid the use of high temperatures and toxic solvents, on the antioxidant compounds recovery from blackberries, is necessary. Thus, high voltage electrical discharges (HVED), pulsed electric fields (PEF), and ultrasounds (USN) treatments were applied in order to evaluate the effects of processing on protein, total phenolics and anthocyanins extraction from blackberries. Moreover, two-stage extraction involving the use of HVED, PEF and USN as pre-treatments and supplementary extraction during 5 h with hot water at mild temperature (50 degrees C) or an hydroalcoholic solution (30% ethanol, w/w) was evaluated. The impacts of both hot water (50 degrees C) and ethanol had a positive influence in total phenolics and anthocyanin recovery, although the yield was clearly influenced by the treatment applied and the targeted compound. The highest protein (37.95 +/- 130 mg/100 g) and TPC (932.69 +/- 33.45 mg/100 g) yields were obtained after HVED and supplementary extraction during 5 h, using ethanol and hot water at 50 degrees C, respectively. However, the maximum anthocyanin yield (98.46 +/- 4.92 mg/100 g) was found after applying PEF treatment and supplementary extraction with hot water at 50 degrees C. These promising findings open the doors to a potential multi-stage green recovery, which can improve the selectivity and the amount of high-added value compounds recovered. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据