4.4 Article

Bispectral Index (BIS) may not predict awareness reaction to intubation in surgical patients

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00008506-200201000-00002

关键词

anesthesia; general; anesthesia; intravenous; propofol; electroencephalography; wakefulness

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bispectral Index (BIS) has been marketed as a measure of the hypnotic component of anesthesia and is recommended as a guide for the administration of hypnotic drugs during anesthesia. BIS values between 40 and 60 are recommended for surgery under general anesthesia. This study investigates whether a BIS baseline between 50 and 60 prevents awareness reaction to endotracheal intubation. After approval by the university's Ethics Committee, 20 consenting patients were enrolled in the study. Midazolam (0.1 mg/kg PO) was given 30 minutes before induction. Anesthesia was induced with alfentanil (10 mcg/kg, followed by 2 mcg/kg(-)/min(-)) and propofol infusion was adjusted to a BIS target level between 50 and 60. Propofol infusion rate was maintained constant for 5 minutes with constant BIS. Prior to intubation, patients were tested in one-minute intervals for awareness using Tunstall's isolated forearm technique. Three minutes after endotracheal intubation, the study period ended and surgery was performed. After intubation, 8 of 20 patients showed an awareness reaction, squeezing the investigator's hand in response to a command. No patient had recall. Comparison of patients with and without awareness reaction revealed no differences in BIS before or after intubation. This study shows that a BIS value between 50 and 60 prior to intubation is inadequate to prevent an awareness reaction to endotracheal intubation during propofol/alfentanil anesthesia. Because BIS cannot differentiate between patients with and without awareness reaction, its value as a monitor for awareness and a measurement of the hypnotic component of anesthesia must be questioned.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据